In the contemporary world, migration is being perceived contentiously as an Islamophobic discourse that Islamizes migrants and portrays them as an “Islamophobia-induced migration” (IIM) that has to be contained by more stringent border and immigration laws. Modern boundaries encapsulate more than their geographical expressions; they are knotty structures that shape reality, ideality, and virtual environments. As part of IIM entrepreneurship and colonial ecosystems, the interaction of IIM manifestations of bordering processes intensifies exclusion and prevents mobility. Islamophobic ideas flourish in both physical and algorithmic spaces, which happens in both structural frameworks and public debate, especially on social media platforms. With significant human rights and freedoms ramifications, advanced technical advancements have revolutionized bordering procedures and produced interoperable border infrastructures and ubiquitous border ecosystems. Technology, such as big data and AI, is employed along with activities on international borders to shape migratory routes, increase surveillance, criminalize migrants, and undermine migrant solidarity. In this context, digital media platforms and technology have also proven to be resistance paraphernalia, exposing IIM and social justice movements and creating anti-Islamophobic spaces and hope solidarities. Thus, the author makes a case for the Constitutionalization of border technologies to elude, demand, and finally dilute boundaries in a globalized world where conservative and far-right bigotry threatens to marginalize communities more profoundly. The author examines recent advancements in the nexus of AI surveillance technology in managing international borders and IIM to offer an understanding of the processes and ramifications of constitutionalizing border crossings. To accomplish equitable societies, we must constitutionalize the technology and combat Islamophobia.